in Re Boy Scouts of America
Opinion
Opinion issued October 14, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00653-CV ——————————— IN RE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA AND SAM HOUSTON AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 6, 2014, relators, Boy Scouts of America and Sam Houston Area
Council Boy Scouts of America, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with a
motion for emergency stay challenging the trial court’s July 28, 2014 order
compelling relators to produce the individuals listed in that order for depositions by August 7, 2014.1 The depositions in question were for the relators’ corporate
representatives to testify regarding the relators’ Form 990 tax returns for 2012.
These depositions were sought, in part, because the relators had recently raised the
affirmative defense of charitable immunity, under the Texas Charitable Immunity
and Liability Act of 1987, TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 84.003(1)(A)
(Vernon Supp. 2004-2005) (the “Act”), based primarily on their tax-exempt status.
We granted the relators’ emergency motion to stay the depositions in
question on August 6, 2014, until the petition was finally decided because the
depositions were scheduled for the next day. The Court also requested and
received a response to the mandamus petition from the real parties in interest Mark
and Melissa Evans, Individually and as Next Friends of J.W.E., a Minor, Deceased.
The Court further received relators’ reply and the real parties’ surreply. We have
“note[d] that the doctrine of charitable immunity [under the Act] has been treated
as an affirmative defense that must be pleaded and proven by parties seeking its
application.” Doctor v. Pardue, 186 S.W.3d 4, 8 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
2006, pet. denied) (citations omitted). Thus, the Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition, the response, relators’ reply, and the surreply, is of the
1 The underlying case is Mark and Melissa Evans, Individually and as Next Friends of J.W.E., a Minor, Deceased v. Sam Houston Area Council Boy Scouts of America; Boy Scouts of America; Sugar Land Baptist, Troop 1845; and Phyllis Lavender, Cause No. 2013-02376, in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Gomez presiding.
2 opinion that relators have not established themselves entitled to the mandamus
relief sought. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus and lift the stay
of the depositions in question imposed by our August 6, 2014 order.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Boy Scouts of America (in Re Boy Scouts of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.