In re Bowie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bowie

219 A.D.2d 6, 639 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3045

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 6 (In re Bowie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bowie, 219 A.D.2d 6, 639 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 22, 1977 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. He states in his affidavit that he has not resided in New York State since 1977 and that he is currently applying for admission to the practice of law in Florida, where he intends to relocate after his admission. He further states [7]*7that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 22, 1977 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. He states in his affidavit that he has not resided in New York State since 1977 and that he is currently applying for admission to the practice of law in Florida, where he intends to relocate after his admission. He further states [7]*7that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 6, 639 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bowie-nyappdiv-1996.