In re Bowen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bowen

190 A.D.2d 950, 593 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1559

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 950 (In re Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bowen, 190 A.D.2d 950, 593 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 17, 1989, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of two years, effective October 16, 1989 (see, [951]*951Matter of Bowen, 150 AD2d 905 [May 1989], Iv denied 74 NY2d 610). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR part 806). Petitioner has advised that it takes no position with respect to respondent’s application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 17, 1989, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of two years, effective October 16, 1989 (see, [951]*951Matter of Bowen, 150 AD2d 905 [May 1989], Iv denied 74 NY2d 610). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR part 806). Petitioner has advised that it takes no position with respect to respondent’s application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 950, 593 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bowen-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack