In re Bousfield & Poole Manuf'g Co.

N.D. Ohio

In re Bousfield & Poole Manuf'g Co.

3 F. Cas. 1016

DecidedJuly 1, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. Cas. 1016 (In re Bousfield & Poole Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bousfield & Poole Manuf'g Co., 3 F. Cas. 1016 (N.D. Ohio 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

WELKER, District Judge.

I have carefully examined the foregoing opinion of M. R. Keith, register, and fully considered the arguments and authorities submitted by the counsel in this case, and fully concur in the opinion of the register, and direct that an order be made, as recommended by him, directing the assignee to pay, out of the moneys in his hands belonging to the said estate, the claim of the United States, being the amount of the judgment, including costs and interest on the judgment to the time of payment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELKER, District Judge.

I have carefully examined the foregoing opinion of M. R. Keith, register, and fully considered the arguments and authorities submitted by the counsel in this case, and fully concur in the opinion of the register, and direct that an order be made, as recommended by him, directing the assignee to pay, out of the moneys in his hands belonging to the said estate, the claim of the United States, being the amount of the judgment, including costs and interest on the judgment to the time of payment

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. Cas. 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bousfield-poole-manufg-co-ohnd-1877.