In re Bound
3 F. Cas. 1001
Opinion
The first specification, in so far as it charges that since the passing of the bankrupt act, the bankrupt being a tradesman within the meaning thereof, has not kept proper books of account in his business, is sustained by the evidence, and a discharge is refused on the ground that such allegation is equivalent [1002]*1002to an allegation that the bankrupt being a tradesman has not, subsequently to the passage of said act, kept proper books of account, and that the case is, therefore, one in which, under section 29, a discharge cannot be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bound, 3 F. Cas. 1001 (S.D.N.Y. 1876).
3 F. Cas. 1001 (In re Bound) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.