In re Bound

3 F. Cas. 1001
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 1, 1876·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The first specification, in so far as it charges that since the passing of the bankrupt act, the bankrupt being a tradesman within the meaning thereof, has not kept proper books of account in his business, is sustained by the evidence, and a discharge is refused on the ground that such allegation is equivalent [1002]*1002to an allegation that the bankrupt being a tradesman has not, subsequently to the passage of said act, kept proper books of account, and that the case is, therefore, one in which, under section 29, a discharge cannot be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bound, 3 F. Cas. 1001 (S.D.N.Y. 1876).

3 F. Cas. 1001 (In re Bound) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.