In re Boston
98 F. 587, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265
Opinion
This matter is heard on an appeal from the decision of Referee Jack, finding that the bankrupt, a few days before filing his voluntary petition, disposed of property not exempt, and applied the same in partial payment of an incumbrance upon property which was exempt; that such transaction upon the part of the bankrupt was in fraud of the bankruptcy law; and that by reason thereof the creditors are entitled to be subrogated as mortgage creditors upon the homestead to the extent of such payment, to wit, $120. This decision of the referee is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Boston, 98 F. 587, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265 (D. Neb. 1899).
98 F. 587 (In re Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Armstrong
93 B.R. 197 (D. Nebraska, 1988)
In re Wilson
123 F. 20 (Ninth Circuit, 1903)