In re: Bostick

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2010·No. 10-1381·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1381

In Re: DARRELL LAMONT BOSTICK,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:05-cr-00200-WLO)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Lamont Bostick, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darrell Lamont Bostick petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting

on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the

district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied

Bostick’s motion on April 8, 2010. Accordingly, because the

district court has recently decided Bostick’s case, we deny the

mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Bostick, (4th Cir. 2010).

In re: Bostick (In re: Bostick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.