In re Borst

357 N.E.2d 1018, 40 N.Y.2d 894, 389 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3113
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1976·Published

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, appeals by appellant infant and appellant mother transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, without costs. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; CPLR [895]*8955601, subd [b], par 2; Matter of Bartsch v State of New York, 33 NY2d 938).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Borst, 357 N.E.2d 1018, 40 N.Y.2d 894, 389 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3113 (N.Y. 1976).

357 N.E.2d 1018 (In re Borst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartsch v. State
309 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)