In re Borst

357 N.E.2d 1018, 40 N.Y.2d 894, 389 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3113
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 357 N.E.2d 1018 (In re Borst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Borst, 357 N.E.2d 1018, 40 N.Y.2d 894, 389 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3113 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, appeals by appellant infant and appellant mother transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, without costs. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; CPLR [895]*8955601, subd [b], par 2; Matter of Bartsch v State of New York, 33 NY2d 938).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartsch v. State
309 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 N.E.2d 1018, 40 N.Y.2d 894, 389 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-borst-ny-1976.