In re Boorda

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Boorda

743 S.E.2d 732, 403 S.C. 359, 2013 WL 2647068, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 135

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 6, 2013

DocketAppellate Case No. 2013-000240; No. 2013-000240

StatusPublished

This text of 743 S.E.2d 732 (In re Boorda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Boorda, 743 S.E.2d 732, 403 S.C. 359, 2013 WL 2647068, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 135 (S.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

JEAN HOEFER TOAL, Chief Justice.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). As indicated in the documents in support of the petition, respondent was charged by Information with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of federal law and he pled guilty to the charge.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI