In re Boom

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Boom

48 Misc. 632, 96 N.Y.S. 204

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 1, 1905·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This application is made under section 1268 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An examination of the record shows that the appellant-bankrupt failed, in several respects, to comply with the Bankruptcy Law relating to the scheduling of claims. It does appear that by reasonable effort, on the part of the bankrupt, he could have ascertained sufficient information to enable him to comply with the law. The decree of the Bankruptcy Court did not operate to discharge the debt for the reason that it was not duly scheduled.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Scott, Gildersleeve and MacLean, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This application is made under section 1268 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An examination of the record shows that the appellant-bankrupt failed, in several respects, to comply with the Bankruptcy Law relating to the scheduling of claims. It does appear that by reasonable effort, on the part of the bankrupt, he could have ascertained sufficient information to enable him to comply with the law. The decree of the Bankruptcy Court did not operate to discharge the debt for the reason that it was not duly scheduled.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present: Scott, Gildersleeve and MacLean, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

In re Boom, 48 Misc. 632, 96 N.Y.S. 204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

48 Misc. 632 (In re Boom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.