In Re Bonnstetter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Bonnstetter. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 712
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 8, 2010·No. 2010-1163·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE BILL J. BONNSTETTER and SUSAN J. FRONK ____________________

2010-1163 (Serial No. 11/466,338) ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

EDMUND J. SEASE, McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C., of, Des Moines, Iowa, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was JANET E. PHIPPS BURKHEAD.

RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitors. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bonnstetter, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

In Re Bonnstetter (In Re Bonnstetter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.