In Re Bonnstetter
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE BILL J. BONNSTETTER and SUSAN J. FRONK ____________________
2010-1163 (Serial No. 11/466,338) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
EDMUND J. SEASE, McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C., of, Des Moines, Iowa, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was JANET E. PHIPPS BURKHEAD.
RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitors. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Bonnstetter (In Re Bonnstetter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.