Home/California Supreme Court/In re Bonilla

In re Bonilla

381 P.3d 222, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 17, 2016
DocketS214960
StatusPublished

This text of 381 P.3d 222 (In re Bonilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bonilla, 381 P.3d 222, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275 (Cal. 2016).

Opinion

The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division **223Two. That court is ordered to vacate its denial dated October 29, 2013 and is further ordered to issue an order to show cause, returnable before the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is to be ordered to show cause, when the matter is placed on calendar, why petitioner is not entitled to make a record of "mitigating evidence tied to his youth." (See People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, 268-269, 283-284, 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 496, 370 P.3d 1053.) The return is *276to be filed on or before September 16, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Franklin
370 P.3d 1053 (California Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 P.3d 222, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bonilla-cal-2016.