In re Bonfiglio

55 A.3d 64, 212 N.J. 435, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1147
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 5, 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-072, concluding that PETER JOSEPH BONFIGLIO, III, of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER JOSEPH BONFIGLIO, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bonfiglio, 55 A.3d 64, 212 N.J. 435, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1147 (N.J. 2012).

55 A.3d 64 (In re Bonfiglio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.