In re Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.

169 Misc. 196, 7 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1223
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1937·Published

Opinion

Frankenthaler, J.

The certificates contain no provision to the effect that the guarantee company (as distinguished from the title company) shall have the right to hold certificates for its own account or that such certificates are to share equally with certificates held by others. The “ presumption is that the holdings of the guarantee company are subordinate to those of other certificate holders. (Matter of Title Mortgage Guaranty Co., 275 N. Y. 347, at p. 355.) As there is nothing to rebut this presumption, the motion is granted. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co., 169 Misc. 196, 7 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1223 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

169 Misc. 196 (In re Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Title Mortgage Guaranty Co.
9 N.E.2d 957 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)