In re Bonavita

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Bonavita

866 A.2d 257

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 17, 2004

DocketNo. 973 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 866 A.2d 257 (In re Bonavita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bonavita, 866 A.2d 257 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on November 4, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Thomas James Bonavita to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Thomas James Bonavita is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on November 4, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Thomas James Bonavita to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Thomas James Bonavita is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 A.2d 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bonavita-pa-2004.