In re Bolton

143 A.3d 878, 226 N.J. 466, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 884
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedAugust 2, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.3d 878 (In re Bolton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bolton, 143 A.3d 878, 226 N.J. 466, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 884 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 15(k) a recommendation (DRB 16-241) that MICHAEL DENNIS BOLTON of BRANCHBURG, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, and who has been temporarily suspended from practice since May 27, 2015, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the determination of the District VIII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VIII-2015-0025F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL DENNIS BOLTON be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective September 2, 2016, and until respondent complies with the determination of the District VIII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VIII-2015-0025F, pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, this Order shall be vacated automatically if the Disciplin[467]*467ary Review Board reports to the Court that respondent has satisfied all obligations under this Order prior to the effective date of the suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent remain temporarily suspended from practice pursuant to the Order of the Court filed May 27, 2015, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20.

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.3d 878, 226 N.J. 466, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bolton-nj-2016.