In re Boiston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Boiston

884 A.2d 846, 584 Pa. 457, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2463

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 30, 2005

DocketNo. 2 DB 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 884 A.2d 846 (In re Boiston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Boiston, 884 A.2d 846, 584 Pa. 457, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2463 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated August 23, 2005, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that WILLIAM J. BOISTON, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law re[847]*847quired for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated August 23, 2005, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that WILLIAM J. BOISTON, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law re[847]*847quired for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 A.2d 846, 584 Pa. 457, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-boiston-pa-2005.