In re Boergers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Boergers

218 A.D.2d 364, 638 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D.2d 364 (In re Boergers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Boergers, 218 A.D.2d 364, 638 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12,1972 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he is currently employed as an attorney with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Washington, D.C., that he has never practiced law in New York, that he does not intend to return to this State to practice [365]*365law, and that he is resigning because he no longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration in this State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12,1972 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he is currently employed as an attorney with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Washington, D.C., that he has never practiced law in New York, that he does not intend to return to this State to practice [365]*365law, and that he is resigning because he no longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration in this State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 364, 638 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-boergers-nyappdiv-1996.