In Re Bobby Joe Buckner v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00320-CR
In re Bobby Joe Buckner
Original Proceeding
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed on September 5, 2025.
There are procedural problems with the petition, including but not limited to,
Relator’s failure to provide proof of service of the petition to the trial court
judge and the State, and the documents relied on by Relator are not properly
sworn. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.3(k); 52.7(a), (c); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE § 132.001(c). Nevertheless, we use Rule 2 to suspend the operation of
these rules and deny relator’s petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
Relator’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, also filed on September 5, 2025, is
dismissed as moot.
LEE HARRIS Justice OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: September 25, 2025 Before Justice Smith, Justice Harris, and Senior Justice Davis 1 Petition denied Motion dismissed Do Not Publish OT06
1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
In re Buckner Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Bobby Joe Buckner v. the State of Texas (In Re Bobby Joe Buckner v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.