In re Board of County Road Commissioners

238 Mich. 29
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Board of County Road Commissioners. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 Mich. 239
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1927·No. Docket No. 64·Published

Opinion

Snow, J.

The board of county road commissioners of Macomb county, pursuant to Act No. 352, Pub. Acts 1925, attempted to condemn certain lands for the purpose of altering, widening, and changing the line of what is known as the Ten-Mile road, and defendants review proceedings on certiorari.

It is contended by defendants, whose land is sought for such purpose, that section 4 of the act denies them the right of notice, hearing, and opportunity to defend on the question of necessity, and is therefore un[30]*30constitutional, being in violation of section 1 of article 13 of the State Constitution. The contention is right. This court has recently so held in Hendershott v. Rogers, 237 Mich. 338, which was handed down after the instant case was received.

In view thereof, the proceedings must be held void and of no effect. No costs to either party, as the matter is one of public moment.

Sharpe, C. J., and Bird, Steers, Fellows, Wiest, Clark, and McDonald, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Board of County Road Commissioners, 238 Mich. 29 (Mich. 1927).

238 Mich. 29 (In re Board of County Road Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendershott v. Rogers
211 N.W. 905 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)