In re B.M.T.
This text of In re B.M.T. (In re B.M.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 32PA23-2
Filed 22 May 2026
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF:
B.M.T., a minor
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a decision of the Court
of Appeals, 292 N.C. App. 26 (2024), affirming an order entered on 16 September 2021
by Judge Teresa H. Vincent in District Court, Guilford County. Heard in the
Supreme Court on 16 April 2026.
Bagwell Holt Smith P.A., by Michael S. Harrell, for petitioner-appellants.
Kathryn S. Lindley for respondent-appellee.
RIGGS, Justice.
Having considered the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the record and briefs,
and the oral arguments before us, we conclude that petitioner-appellants’ petition for
discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re B.M.T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bmt-nc-2026.