Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re B.M.

In re B.M.

918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 2009·No. 2009-1981·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-60, 09AP-61, 09AP-62, 09AP-63, and 09AP-64, 2009-Ohio-4846.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent. O’Connor, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re B.M., 918 N.E.2d 527, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2009).

918 N.E.2d 527 (In re B.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.