In re Blunt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Blunt

50 A.3d 37, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3871565, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 841

DecidedSeptember 6, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.3d 37 (In re Blunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blunt, 50 A.3d 37, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3871565, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 841 (N.J. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having Tiled with the Court its decision in DRB 11-182, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against JOHN L. BLUNT of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint filed against JOHN L. BLUNT in District Docket No. IIB-2010-0043E, is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having Tiled with the Court its decision in DRB 11-182, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against JOHN L. BLUNT of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint filed against JOHN L. BLUNT in District Docket No. IIB-2010-0043E, is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.3d 37, 211 N.J. 604, 2012 WL 3871565, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blunt-nj-2012.