In re Blumenthal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Blumenthal

117 A.3d 175, 222 N.J. 25, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 795

DecidedJuly 15, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.3d 175 (In re Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blumenthal, 117 A.3d 175, 222 N.J. 25, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 795 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-309, concluding that THOMAS ALAN BLUMENTHAL of RIDGEFIELD PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), RPC 3.4(a) (unlawfully obstructing another party’s access to evidence), and RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS ALAN BLUMENTHAL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-309, concluding that THOMAS ALAN BLUMENTHAL of RIDGEFIELD PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), RPC 3.4(a) (unlawfully obstructing another party’s access to evidence), and RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS ALAN BLUMENTHAL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.3d 175, 222 N.J. 25, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blumenthal-nj-2015.