In re Blum
92 N.Y.S. 1116
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1905·Published
Opinion
In the matter of Benjamin Blum. In the matter of Mary T. Bunnell. E. L. Mooney, for Blum. H. W. Thomas, for Bunnell. No opinion. Order affirmed, with'$10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Blum, 92 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
92 N.Y.S. 1116 (In re Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.