In re Block

178 A.3d 699, 232 N.J. 110
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 9, 2018
DocketD-206 Sept. Term 2016; 079911
StatusPublished

This text of 178 A.3d 699 (In re Block) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Block, 178 A.3d 699, 232 N.J. 110 (N.J. 2018).

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-062, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent) that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 9, 2015, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years for violating RPC 3.3 (a)(1) and (5) (lack of candor toward a tribunal); RPC 5.5(a)(1) (practicing while administratively ineligible and practicing while suspended); RPC 8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority); RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); and Rule 1:20-20 (failure to file affidavit of compliance);

And the Court having determined in its review of the matter that a one-year suspension from practice is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of **111Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.3d 699, 232 N.J. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-block-nj-2018.