In re Bloch
253 A.D. 779, 1 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bloch. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 A.D. 636 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1937·Published
Opinion
Application by Lester W. Bloch for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law, granted; the said Lester W. Bloch is hereby reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law. [See 248 App. Div. 921.] Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents, unless the applicant furnishes a certificate of the character committee for the Third Judicial District recommending his reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bloch, 253 A.D. 779, 1 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
253 A.D. 779 (In re Bloch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Selkirk
248 A.D. 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)