In re Blewitt

New York Supreme Court

In re Blewitt

22 N.Y.S. 1107, 68 Hun 127, 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 127, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 929

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 17, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 N.Y.S. 1107 (In re Blewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blewitt, 22 N.Y.S. 1107, 68 Hun 127, 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 127, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nothing needs to be added to the opinion of the special term, upon which the order may well be affirmed, except that it appears from the record that the alleged lunatic has escaped from the custody of the committee, and has left the state of New York, and refuses to disclose his whereabouts; so that it is impossible to procure an examination to be made by a disinterested physician as to his present mental condition. We think the order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nothing needs to be added to the opinion of the special term, upon which the order may well be affirmed, except that it appears from the record that the alleged lunatic has escaped from the custody of the committee, and has left the state of New York, and refuses to disclose his whereabouts; so that it is impossible to procure an examination to be made by a disinterested physician as to his present mental condition. We think the order should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.Y.S. 1107, 68 Hun 127, 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 127, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blewitt-nysupct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack