In re Bleichner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Bleichner

879 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. LEXIS 1662, 2004 WL 1096803

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 14, 2004·No. No. 2004-OB-0902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CALOGERO, Chief Justice,

concurs.

I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CALOGERO, Chief Justice,

concurs.

I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.

In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. LEXIS 1662, 2004 WL 1096803 (La. 2004).

Pincite

879 So. 2d 112 (In re Bleichner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related