In re Bleichner
879 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. LEXIS 1662, 2004 WL 1096803
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 14, 2004
DocketNo. 2004-OB-0902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 879 So. 2d 112 (In re Bleichner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. LEXIS 1662, 2004 WL 1096803 (La. 2004).
Opinion
concurs.
I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dean v. Southmark Const.
879 So. 2d 112 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
879 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. LEXIS 1662, 2004 WL 1096803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bleichner-la-2004.