In re Blecher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Blecher

136 A.D.2d 353, 527 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.2d 353 (In re Blecher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blecher, 136 A.D.2d 353, 527 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding to discipline the respondent Sam Blecher for professional misconduct, the respondent has submitted an affidavit dated February 12, 1988, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). The respondent was admitted to practice as an attor[354]*354ney by this court on November 19, 1952. By order of this court dated June 12, 1987, the petitioner Grievance Committee was authorized to institute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, and by notice of petition and petition dated October 1, 1987, that disciplinary proceeding was commenced.

The respondent acknowledges that there is presently pending against him a disciplinary proceeding involving allegations of professional misconduct that he commingled clients’ and personal funds in three different escrow bank accounts and caused checks to be issued from those accounts for both escrow and personal obligations, and that he failed to maintain a proper ledger book or similar records for his escrow accounts as required by the rules of this court.

The respondent acknowledges that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against the allegations of professional misconduct outlined above, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

The petitioner Grievance Committee recommends the acceptance of the resignation. Under the circumstances herein, the resignation of the respondent as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. The respondent is disbarred and it is ordered that his . name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law effective forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding to discipline the respondent Sam Blecher for professional misconduct, the respondent has submitted an affidavit dated February 12, 1988, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). The respondent was admitted to practice as an attor[354]*354ney by this court on November 19, 1952. By order of this court dated June 12, 1987, the petitioner Grievance Committee was authorized to institute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, and by notice of petition and petition dated October 1, 1987, that disciplinary proceeding was commenced.

The respondent acknowledges that there is presently pending against him a disciplinary proceeding involving allegations of professional misconduct that he commingled clients’ and personal funds in three different escrow bank accounts and caused checks to be issued from those accounts for both escrow and personal obligations, and that he failed to maintain a proper ledger book or similar records for his escrow accounts as required by the rules of this court.

The respondent acknowledges that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against the allegations of professional misconduct outlined above, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

The petitioner Grievance Committee recommends the acceptance of the resignation. Under the circumstances herein, the resignation of the respondent as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. The respondent is disbarred and it is ordered that his . name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law effective forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.2d 353, 527 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blecher-nyappdiv-1988.