In re Blatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Blatt

257 A.D. 278, 12 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7728

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On May 2, 1939, the respondent was convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of a violation of section 88 of title 18 of the United States Code (Crim. Code, § 37). Said crime is a felony.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On May 2, 1939, the respondent was convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of a violation of section 88 of title 18 of the United States Code (Crim. Code, § 37). Said crime is a felony.

Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Blatt, 257 A.D. 278, 12 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 278 (In re Blatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related