In re Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Blake

37 A.D.2d 625, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 625 (In re Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blake, 37 A.D.2d 625, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to statute (Code Grim. Pro., § 485-b) the Chief Clerk of the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, by letter to this court, dated May 28, 1971, has certified that the above-named James Blake (who was admitted to practice by this court on December 22, 1937) was tried and convicted of the crimes of conspiracy and attempted extortion at a Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, and that on May 27,1971 sentence was imposed by said court. Accordingly, by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, said James Blake has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. On this court’s own motion, an order will be entered directing that the name of said J ames Blake be forthwith struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to statute (Code Grim. Pro., § 485-b) the Chief Clerk of the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, by letter to this court, dated May 28, 1971, has certified that the above-named James Blake (who was admitted to practice by this court on December 22, 1937) was tried and convicted of the crimes of conspiracy and attempted extortion at a Term of the Supreme Court, New York County, and that on May 27,1971 sentence was imposed by said court. Accordingly, by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, said James Blake has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. On this court’s own motion, an order will be entered directing that the name of said J ames Blake be forthwith struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 625, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blake-nyappdiv-1971.