In re Blake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Blake

66 N.Y.S. 1127

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.Y.S. 1127 (In re Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blake, 66 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Decree of surrogate’s court affirmed, without costs to either party. Held, that under the will of Anthony Blake, deceased, the petitioner is entitled to receive during her natural life the income from the trust fund of $4,000 set apart for her support, and such part of such principal sum as may be needful therefor, considering all the circumstances and without reference to what income she may receive from her individual property or from other sources. Held, further, that under the evidence in this proceeding it cannot be said that the surrogate’s^ court did not properly exercise its discretion in fixing the amount to be paid annually to the appellant. In case of any material change in the circumstances of the parties, they are at liberty to apply to the surrogate’s court for a modification of the decree. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Decree of surrogate’s court affirmed, without costs to either party. Held, that under the will of Anthony Blake, deceased, the petitioner is entitled to receive during her natural life the income from the trust fund of $4,000 set apart for her support, and such part of such principal sum as may be needful therefor, considering all the circumstances and without reference to what income she may receive from her individual property or from other sources. Held, further, that under the evidence in this proceeding it cannot be said that the surrogate’s^ court did not properly exercise its discretion in fixing the amount to be paid annually to the appellant. In case of any material change in the circumstances of the parties, they are at liberty to apply to the surrogate’s court for a modification of the decree. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blake-nyappdiv-1900.