In re Blake

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Blake

671 A.2d 585, 143 N.J. 387, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 580

DecidedMarch 6, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 671 A.2d 585 (In re Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Blake, 671 A.2d 585, 143 N.J. 387, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 580 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on January 29, 1996, filed with the Court its decision recommending that a letter of admonition be issued to DEXTER B. BLAKE of BASKING RIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, for violation of RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[388]*388ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on January 29, 1996, filed with the Court its decision recommending that a letter of admonition be issued to DEXTER B. BLAKE of BASKING RIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, for violation of RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[388]*388ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 A.2d 585, 143 N.J. 387, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blake-nj-1996.