In re Blaize F.

55 A.D.3d 974, 864 N.Y.S.2d 793
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 2008·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family [975]*975Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered July 3, 2007, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Fámily Ct Act article 10, to extend the supervision of respondent’s children for a period of 12 months.

The order appealed from was modified prior to its expiration, is now expired and has been superceded by a subsequent order extending supervision thus rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Marcel S., 15 AD3d 808, 809 [2005]; Matter of John I., 6 AD3d 991 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; Matter of Trebor UU, 287 AD2d 830 [2001]).

Spain, J.E, Kane, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Blaize F., 55 A.D.3d 974, 864 N.Y.S.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 974 (In re Blaize F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Jordan SS. (Kevin SS.)
2020 NY Slip Op 1210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Abigail QQ.
146 A.D.3d 1252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Blaize F.
64 A.D.3d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Destiny HH.
63 A.D.3d 1230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Chelsea M.
61 A.D.3d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)