In re Bittker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bittker

208 A.D.2d 109, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 109 (In re Bittker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bittker, 208 A.D.2d 109, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on January 13, 1942 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In his affidavit he states that he was admitted to practice law in 1951 in the State of Connecticut, where he currently resides, that he does not intend to return to New [110]*110York, and that he is resigning so that it will no longer be necessary for him to comply with the attorney registration requirements of New York State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on January 13, 1942 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In his affidavit he states that he was admitted to practice law in 1951 in the State of Connecticut, where he currently resides, that he does not intend to return to New [110]*110York, and that he is resigning so that it will no longer be necessary for him to comply with the attorney registration requirements of New York State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 109, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bittker-nyappdiv-1995.