In re Bissell
40 Mich. 63
Opinion
Bissell was committed for contempt in refusing to pay alimony. The order of committal was regular on its face and recited that the contempt was admitted. The petition was based chiefly upon denials of the fact.
[64]*64Held that the Supreme Court cannot, on an application for a writ of habeas corpus, review a committal apparently regular; the petitioner should have appealed from the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bissell, 40 Mich. 63 (Mich. 1879).
40 Mich. 63 (In re Bissell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Stone
294 N.W. 156 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)
In Re Lupu
281 N.W. 236 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Cooper v. People Ex Rel. Wyatt
22 P. 790 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)