In re Bishop
This text of 282 A.D. 679 (In re Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As it appears that petitioner has not been afforded an adequate opportunity to examine and inspect the books and records of Hazel Bishop, Inc., there is no need of a reference to establish that fact. In view of the speeia' circumstances here, such inspection should proceed to completion under the supervision of a referee. Petitioner’s motion to punish defendant [respondent corporation] for contempt should at this time be denied. Petitioner’s cross motion to inspect the books and records of the two corporations Product Enterprises Corporation and Raymond Spector Company, Inc., was properly denied as they are not parties to this proceeding. The order is accordingly modified by granting the motion and cross motion only to the extent of appointing a referee to supervise the further inspection of the books and records of Hazel Bishop, Inc. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 679, 122 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bishop-nyappdiv-1953.