in Re: Billy Wayne Horton
This text of in Re: Billy Wayne Horton (in Re: Billy Wayne Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed August 24, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00810-CV
IN RE BILLY WAYNE HORTON, Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2 Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1-20-0837
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein
Before the Court is relator’s August 17, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus.
Relator challenges the trial court’s requirement that the parties in the underlying
case engage in mediation. In his petition, relator argues that the underlying case
should be stayed pending resolution of this original proceeding.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to comply with requirements set out in Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 52 for filing a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator failed
to certify that the factual statements in the record are true and supported by
competent evidence in the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). Relator failed to
provide an appendix or record in support of the petition and thus provided no
sworn or certified copy of the challenged order or ruling or of every document that
is material to the relator’s claim for relief that was filed in any underlying
proceeding nor a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a). We conclude that relator, as the party
seeking relief, has not met the burden of providing the Court an adequate record to
establish a right to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Having
denied mandamus relief, we also deny relator’s request that the underlying
proceedings be stayed as moot.
/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
220810F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Billy Wayne Horton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-wayne-horton-texapp-2022.