in Re: Billy Shannon McKinney
This text of in Re: Billy Shannon McKinney (in Re: Billy Shannon McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED; Opinion Filed August 7, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01005-CV
IN RE BILLY SHANNON MCKINNEY, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 24008-422
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Moseley Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court compel the trial
court to rule on motions filed on March 25, 2014 and June 3, 2014. The facts and issues are
well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here. A trial court has a reasonable time
within which to consider a motion and to rule. In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.—
Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not
shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
141005F.P05 /Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Billy Shannon McKinney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-shannon-mckinney-texapp-2014.