in Re Billy Joe Scales
This text of in Re Billy Joe Scales (in Re Billy Joe Scales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-071-CV
IN RE BILLY JOE SCALES RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relief should be denied. 2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 This court has been informed by the district clerk’s office and by the trial court clerk for Criminal District Court No. 1 that they have not received the motion for DNA testing that relator contends he filed. Presentment of the motion to the trial court is a prerequisite to mandamus relief. See O’Connor v. First Court of Appeals, 837 S.W .2d 94, 97 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will issue when there is a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal.”); In re Chavez, 62 S.W .3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding) (“Indeed, one can hardly be faulted for doing nothing if he were never aware of the need to act.”). Because relator’s motion has never been received by the district clerk’s office for filing, the Respondent has not been provided an opportunity to rule upon the motion. PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 15, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Billy Joe Scales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-joe-scales-texapp-2010.