in Re Billy Joe Burd
This text of in Re Billy Joe Burd (in Re Billy Joe Burd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26, 2018.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00485-CV
IN RE BILLY JOE BURD, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 93025-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 14, 2018, relator Billy Joe Burd filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Lamar McCorkle, the assigned visiting judge of the 149th District Court of Brazoria County, to vacate an oral order he rendered at a February 2, 2018 hearing, denying relator’s motion to dismiss the action.
To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Billy Joe Burd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-joe-burd-texapp-2018.