in Re Billy Holmes
This text of in Re Billy Holmes (in Re Billy Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 1, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00947-CR
IN RE BILLY HOLMES, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 10, 2009, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable David Mendoza, presiding judge of the 178th District Court of Harris County, to rule on his affidavit of indigency.
In filing an affidavit of indigency, relator sought to proceed on appeal without payment of fees. Because relator has not been required to pay court fees, received a free record, and has been appointed an attorney on appeal, he has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Billy Holmes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-holmes-texapp-2009.