In Re Billy Bond v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 25, 2025
Docket01-25-00191-CR
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Billy Bond v. the State of Texas (In Re Billy Bond v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Billy Bond v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 25, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00191-CR ——————————— IN RE BILLY BOND, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Billy Bond, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, filed a petition for

writ of mandamus requesting that this Court “direct[] the 198th District Court,

respondent, to release the [a]ppellate [r]ecord in Cause Number B96-229, styled The

State of Texas v. Billy Bond, in which relator is charged with [a]ggravated [s]exual

[assault].”

We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The State of Texas is divided into fifteen courts of appeals districts. This

Court’s district “is composed of the counties of Austin, Brazoria, Chambers,

Colorado, Fort Bend, Galveston, Grimes, Harris, Waller, and Washington.” TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(a)-(b). The 198th District Court is located in Kerr

County, Texas. Kerr County is within the district of the Fourth Court of Appeals

located in San Antonio, Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(k).

This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of mandamus

seeking to compel an action by a trial court of a county not within this Court’s

district. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (providing that courts of appeals

may issues writs of mandamus “against a judge of a district, statutory county,

statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district”); In re

Johnson, 279 S.W.3d 700, 701 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2007, orig. proceeding)

(dismissing mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction because relator sought relief

against trial court in county not within court of appeals’ district).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Johnson
279 S.W.3d 700 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Billy Bond v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billy-bond-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.