In Re Bills of Morse to Grievance Committee

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 468, 7 Conn. Supp. 468, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 158
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 468 (In Re Bills of Morse to Grievance Committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Bills of Morse to Grievance Committee, 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 468, 7 Conn. Supp. 468, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 158 (Colo. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

FOSTER, J.

During the months of September, October and November, Mr. Joseph B. Morse, at the request of the ■grievance committee of this county, performed services for said committee and duly presented his bills for such services. These ’bills have been approved by the chairman of the grievance committee and have been presented to the court’ for taxation and •allowance.

At the request of the court, Mr. Morse has elaborated his ’bills by showing the amount of time expended by him and the dates upon which such time was expended and the nature of rthe services rendered.

*469 I find the bills to be reasonable in amount.

The grievance committee in good faith, by virtue of sections 1382e and 1384e of the 1939 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes, ordered the services to be performed by Mr. Morse, and Mr. Morse, in good faith, relying upon the action of the grievance committee and upon the statutes, performed the services.

The court has and does tax and allow the bills as presented.

In doing so, however, the court calls attention to the following action taken at a meeting of all the judges of the Superior ■Court on November 27, 1939:

In re employment by grievance committees of paid counsel:

1. No attorney to be employed on yearly or annual basis.

2. Attorney to be engaged to do specific things or work.

3. Bills when rendered to be accompanied by statement of -nature of work done and time spent.

4. No attempt to be made to codify what may be deemed unlawful practice of law, except to satisfy themselves what acts or conduct should be presented to the court.

5. Only such reasonable bills of the committee and their attorneys, when the work is entrusted to them for the above -purposes, to be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Conn. Super. Ct. 468, 7 Conn. Supp. 468, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bills-of-morse-to-grievance-committee-connsuperct-1939.