in Re Billie O. Stone
This text of in Re Billie O. Stone (in Re Billie O. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00664-CV
In re Billie O. Stone
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Billie O. Stone concurrently filed this and another identically styled
petition for writ of mandamus, both of which complain of an allegedly fraudulent lien.1 Each
indicates that it is related to an appeal already pending before this Court.2 We conclude that
the record before us is insufficient to allow us to consider Stone’s petition. See Tex. R. App.
P. 52.7(a)(1), (2). The rules of appellate procedure require a relator to file a certified or sworn
copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in
the underlying proceeding and a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from
any underlying proceeding (including any exhibits offered in evidence) or a statement that no
testimony was adduced in connection with the matter. Id. The filings in this case do not comply
1 The companion petition is In re Billie O. Stone, No. 03-22-00664-CV (Tex. App.— Austin filed Oct. 18, 2022). Both petitions were filed as In re To a Fraudulent Purported Lien or Claim Against, Billie O. Stone and Patricia A. Stone but have been modified to conform to Rule 52.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding the captioning of an original proceeding. 2 Billie O. Stone d/b/a Stobil Enterprise v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union, No. 03-21-00422-CV (Tex. App.—Austin filed Aug. 26, 2021). with the requirements of rule 52.7 and, most notably, do not include a copy of a district court
order from which relief is sought.
Having reviewed the petition and the materials provided, we deny the petition for
writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Filed: November 8, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Billie O. Stone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-billie-o-stone-texapp-2022.