In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas

DecidedFebruary 5, 2025

Docket04-24-00763-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas (In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00763-CV

IN RE BILL WILBURN, Relator

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2025

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 15, 2024, relator filed an amended petition for writ of mandamus, seeking

relief from an order issued on November 6, 2024, which struck a prior order granting relator sole

conservatorship of his daughter, among other relief. Relator asserts the trial court erred by

conducting the November 6, 2024 hearing and issuing the challenged order because relator never

received formal notice of the hearing.

On November 27, 2024, we issued an order that provided:

[R]elator’s mandamus petition fails to comply with Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Additionally, relator failed to provide a mandamus record as required by Rule 52.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. And relator has not provided “a certified or sworn copy of [the] order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of,” as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A).

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023EM501899, styled In the Interest of A.S.W., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Benjamin Robertson presiding. 04-24-00763-CV

Relator shall file an amended petition that complies with Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Additionally, relator shall file either the complained of order, or a transcript reflecting the complained of ruling, by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Relator shall also file a mandamus record by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Any such record must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7.

To date, Relator has failed to comply with our November 27, 2024 order. Therefore,

based on the amended petition and lack of mandamus record before us, this court must conclude

relator has failed to establish his right to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied as

moot.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00763-CV

IN RE BILL WILBURN, Relator

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2025

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 15, 2024, relator filed an amended petition for writ of mandamus, seeking

relief from an order issued on November 6, 2024, which struck a prior order granting relator sole

conservatorship of his daughter, among other relief. Relator asserts the trial court erred by

conducting the November 6, 2024 hearing and issuing the challenged order because relator never

received formal notice of the hearing.

On November 27, 2024, we issued an order that provided:

[R]elator’s mandamus petition fails to comply with Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Additionally, relator failed to provide a mandamus record as required by Rule 52.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. And relator has not provided “a certified or sworn copy of [the] order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of,” as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A).

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023EM501899, styled In the Interest of A.S.W., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Benjamin Robertson presiding. 04-24-00763-CV

Relator shall file an amended petition that complies with Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Additionally, relator shall file either the complained of order, or a transcript reflecting the complained of ruling, by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Relator shall also file a mandamus record by December 20, 2024, or his mandamus petition is subject to being dismissed. Any such record must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7.

To date, Relator has failed to comply with our November 27, 2024 order. Therefore,

based on the amended petition and lack of mandamus record before us, this court must conclude

relator has failed to establish his right to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied as

moot.

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re Bill Wilburn v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bill-wilburn-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.