in Re Bilford Dwight Junious
This text of in Re Bilford Dwight Junious (in Re Bilford Dwight Junious) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00429-CV
IN RE BILFORD DWIGHT JUNIOUS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 13, 2010, Relator, Bilford Dwight Junious, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator complains of the trial court’s ruling on the District Clerk’s contest to his affidavit of indigence.
The Rules of Appellate Procedure require that the appendix to a petition for writ of mandamus contain “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of[.]” Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Relator failed to attach the trial court’s order to his petition. Because relator’s petition does not contain the order sustaining the District Clerk’s contest as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure, relator has not demonstrated his entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Frost, and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Bilford Dwight Junious, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bilford-dwight-junious-texapp-2010.