In Re: Big Baboon, Inc.
This text of In Re: Big Baboon, Inc. (In Re: Big Baboon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: BIG BABOON, INC., Appellant ______________________
2016-1019 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/010,987. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
FREDERICK A. LORIG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRUCE R. ZISSER.
COKE MORGAN STEWART, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Big Baboon, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-big-baboon-inc-cafc-2016.