In re Bidwood's Estate

85 A. 6, 86 Vt. 295, 1912 Vt. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedNovember 14, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A. 6 (In re Bidwood's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bidwood's Estate, 85 A. 6, 86 Vt. 295, 1912 Vt. LEXIS 184 (Vt. 1912).

Opinion

Rowell, C. J.

Appeal from probate. The only question is whether the one-third interest that the husband is entitled to by P. S. 2934 in his deceased wife’s real estate whereof they are seised in her right in fee-simple at the time of her death, can be sold under a license from the probate court for the payment of her debts and the expenses of administration. It is clear that it can be. It is given in lieu of curtesy, as shown by the statute creating the right — No. 44, sec. 15, Acts of 1896 — and curtesy was subject to be defeated by such a sale. Bennett v. Camp, 54 [296]*296Vt. 36, and there is nothing in the statute to indicate that this interest stands any better in this respect than curtesy stood.

Affirmed. Let a certificate go down.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BENNETT v. CAMP
54 Vt. 36 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A. 6, 86 Vt. 295, 1912 Vt. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bidwoods-estate-vt-1912.